@ucas_online has published its report on higher education #AdmissionsReform ( https://www.ucas.com/about-us/news-and-key-documents/reforming-admissions)">https://www.ucas.com/about-us/... and, as I forecast, has opted for a model of PQO as its preferred route. https://twitter.com/JohnnySRich/status/1382352608094994432">https://twitter.com/JohnnySRi...

A thread... 1/26
You have got to admire @ucas_online’s openness to reform and their resistance to having ill-considered changes thrust upon them by DfE or others who might get it into their heads that they have the authority to do so. (They don& #39;t – within the law as it currently stands.)

2/26
In the accompanying press release @clareucas cites "unconditional offers and the use of the predicted grades" as the two "well documented challenges with the current system".

So, presumably, UCAS& #39;s proposed PQO-style reform solves these challenges?
3/26
Well, HEIs themselves (well, @UniversitiesUK) have already in effect agreed *conditional* unconditional offers shouldn& #39;t be used in future.
https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/news/Pages/Universities-UK-publishes-recommendations-for-reforms-to-make-university-admissions-fairer-and-more-transparent.aspx

(Now">https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/news/Page... why was that so hard? [sigh] Never mind.)

BTW other unconditional offers often have good reasons.
4/26
So at least PQO will get rid of predicted grades, right? Not entirely, as students will still want (and even need) them in order to know where to apply where they stand a realistic chance of getting a place.

5/26
Most of the "challenges" of predicted grades will persist, but instead of the supposed damage being perpetrated by universities making choices based on predictions, it& #39;ll be less transparent – self-imposed exclusion by students or under & #39;guidance& #39; by teachers, parents, etc.

6/26
Indeed, predicted grades might be seen as at least as good a measure of a student& #39;s potential as the grading of actual summative A-level exams which are fuzzily accurate at best and in any case aim to measure performance on a particular day. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/build-back-higher-regulation/">https://wonkhe.com/blogs/bui...

8/26
PQO would up the stakes of these single-day measures of performance effectively turning A level grades (even high ones) into a pass or fail at acceptance, largely without context.

9/26
Of course, HEIs could still apply contextual algorithms, but in a compressed post-qualification process would have less time to consider the individual& #39;s particular circumstance and make the fine judgements necessary.

10/26
Besides, these aren& #39;t the real problems of the current admissions system (which, to be honest, could be far worse).

The real problem is that the system doesn& #39;t promote optimal matching of students, courses and institutions through informed decision-making on both sides.

11/26
What students need is a steady process of examining options, gaining understanding, and making choices free from undue pressures.

12/26
On the university side, the best matches are served by a rounded understanding of the applicant, their potential, their motivations, their background and circumstances.

13/26
The current system is at its worst during Clearing where everything I& #39;ve described above disintegrates into a mad melée to find and fill places.

14/26
Shocker: There& #39;s a clear correlation between students going through clearing and those who drop out.

(Ok, I know...

***Correlation is not causation***

...but it& #39;s not a stretch to suggest that when people make choices in haste they make less good ones.)

15/26
And who does this problem afflict worst? Yes, you guessed...

Disadvantaged students are less likely to have access to good careers IAG in their school/college, are less likely to have friends/family who know about uni entrance, and are more likely to use Clearing.

17/26
So surely UCAS& #39;s PQO plan will solve this problem at least and will do away with Clearing?

Nope. It "retains Clearing" because unis would "require" it. That& #39;s a fair comment and a good reason why UCAS& #39;s model has at least one advantage over DfE& #39;s: it& #39;s actually workable.
18/26
But even if UCAS has worked out how to drop Clearing from their PQO process, it wouldn& #39;t really have disappeared, but rather expanded.

Rather than *no one* being in Clearing, *everyone* would be – with all the attendant bad choices.

19/26
I know the idea of PQO is that all the decision-making goes on before exams, but behaviourally, that& #39;s not how choices work. Most people only make the hard choices when the chips are actually down. Decisions people may come to regret will be compressed into post-exam fever.
20/26
One of the invisible tricks of the current system is to ease applicants along a conveyor belt towards a decision, options narrowing until, for most people, the choice is almost made for them. (I& #39;m not saying it& #39;s perfect.)

21/26
I& #39;m all for reforming #HEadmissions – the system is flawed – but just because it should change that definitely does not mean that any change constitutes an improvement.

22/26
The current system has withstood 50 years of changes in HE, adapting and evolving. We throw that away for an untried overhaul at our peril. It& #39;s likely to cause greater harms through unintended consequences that those caused by the problems it seeks to solve.

24/26
If anyone cares to ask me to design a better system, I& #39;m happy to bore them with my ideas, but there& #39;s one thing I think we can all agree on: this thread has already gone on quite long enough.

26/26
You can follow @JohnnySRich.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: