This thread is really disappointing. I don’t really like Nate but it’s clear what he meant.

Pundits discussed how the courts could somehow flip the election. They weren’t discussing disenfranchisement. Related or no, we can still call them out for focusing on the former. https://twitter.com/mspackyetti/status/1331480366805299202">https://twitter.com/mspackyet...

All the white dudes QT’ing this with “Please read this thread” are being patronizing cause they know it’s kinda off base.

Like are we taking issue with Silver’s use of “steal”? Is that really it??

And yes, disenfranchisement on and before Election Day is categorically different than court attempts to throw out votes. Things can be related but very different.