Continuing to be https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤨" title="Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue" aria-label="Emoji: Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue"> at politicians talking about unity but not actually addressing the people who voted against them.

KH:
> You delivered a clear message. You chose hope, and unity, decency, science, and yes—truth.

"Clear message"—MAYBE if a landslide. https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1325248921367687170">https://twitter.com/NBCNews/s...
What would it be like for someone to stand up in a "1st speech as [vice] president-elect" & say

"You know, we honestly thought we would get more votes than we did. That tells us there& #39;s something we don& #39;t understand about the needs of all Americans. We& #39;re gonna listen closer."
THEN talk of unity would be more than an ideal.

(to be clear, I& #39;m aware that most of the audience at this event *are* probably Biden+Harris voters. Doesn& #39;t matter. They& #39;re addressing the whole country, and the world (hi from https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🇨🇦" title="Flagge von Kanada" aria-label="Emoji: Flagge von Kanada">!) via this speech.)
KH:
> "You chose Joe Biden as the next POTUS"

This represents the American will as being already unified. It& #39;s exactly the sort of language that encourages compartmentalization in individuals, and I would expect it to encourage division in a nation as well.
It says "the will that spoke most vehemently won, and all dissenters can stuff it."

A series of primary votes then a national election is an absurdly crude approximation of collective will. It& #39;s what we& #39;ve got, but we don& #39;t have to pretend that it& #39;s actually good.
Timely quote from Churchill.

Note that these don& #39;t strictly contradict. KH& #39;s quote doesn& #39;t portray US democracy as perfect. But it does portray it in a way that suggests people should feel satisfied with it, even if they don& #39;t. https://twitter.com/RichardEngel/status/1325224840412934144">https://twitter.com/RichardEn...
I honestly don& #39;t expect most people to get this, because my understanding of it is only a few months old, and came out of a bunch of deep exploration into the nature of the psyche (Unlocking the Emotional Brain) and dialogue (On Dialogue by Bohm) and trust.

Still articulating.
This tweet calls it:
> I’m not really interested in “unity” or “healing” with the people who called me god awful things for four years simply for not agreeing with them politically. So don’t be surprised I don’t want to hold hands and sing kumbaya. https://twitter.com/jason_games1984/status/1325252632206843904">https://twitter.com/jason_gam...
Dialogue requires acknowledging this: you don& #39;t know what you need to know in order to integrate with others—truly integrate, which means respecting their INTEGRITY.

You have to listen. https://twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/status/1325239229845286913">https://twitter.com/Malcolm_O...
Biden, ~21mins in the video:
> Refusal of Ds & Rs to cooperate with each other is not some mysterious force beyond our control. It& #39;s a decision… if we can decide not to cooperate, we can decide to cooperate."

I see it not as a decision but skills: listening & finding win-wins.
If you don& #39;t have those skills, then "deciding to cooperate" means "deciding to compromise" means "deciding to half give up".

With those skills, you don& #39;t have to *decide* to cooperate. You just *do* because it *works better*. Win-wins are stable, rather than contested.
While writing this thread, I found myself imagining writing an alternate pair of speeches for Harris & Biden to deliver on this occasion. I think that would be a
profound & challenging exercise for any aspiring memetic mediator.
You can follow @Malcolm_Ocean.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: