1) Because many of you are concerned about this, maybe I can throw some light on the PA decision.
2) It can be appealed. Likely will. If they are smart, they& #39;ll wait until they are sure to get ACB on the bench first. https://twitter.com/Ronhill1999Hill/status/1318350062846697474">https://twitter.com/Ronhill19...
2) It can be appealed. Likely will. If they are smart, they& #39;ll wait until they are sure to get ACB on the bench first. https://twitter.com/Ronhill1999Hill/status/1318350062846697474">https://twitter.com/Ronhill19...
3) I suspect--and Zen Master can correct--that because this was returned without a precedent setting ruling, the Court doesn& #39;t want to rule on all of these piecemeal.
4) My guess is they will package all of them in a single ruling on what constitutes the "cutoff" for votes.
4) My guess is they will package all of them in a single ruling on what constitutes the "cutoff" for votes.
5) As for PA, Rs added another NET 9,000 registrations last week. This alone is probably a sufficient buffer to an planned fraud.
6) I don& #39;t think PA will be the tipping point by the time these "votes" would even be used. I think the election will be called. Too many states.
6) I don& #39;t think PA will be the tipping point by the time these "votes" would even be used. I think the election will be called. Too many states.