I may not have been playing tabletop RPGs for long but i don& #39;t believe in the idea of the existence of objectively good/bad GMs based on ability or whatnot bc in most cases each GM just has a different style and it all depends on the players and their preferences (1/?)

Sure there are ways u can become a "better" GM but what defines what that means? To have a stronger storyline? To work on character development? To have engaging challenges? To give players more autonomy and options for exploration? To make the tone of your games different? (2/)

Every GM has strengths and weaknesses but that doesn& #39;t necessarily define them as "good" or "bad." It& #39;s collaborative storytelling dude, in the end what matters is the party including the GM having fun and making the most out of their games (end of thread for now)