Read on Twitter
You may know this:
UK #InternalMarket Bill has arrived @UKHouseofLords.
But prob. no debate til after crunch EU Council, i.e. week after next.
But what you may not know:
It looks quite different to way it did before, inc. *big* amendments to part on N.Ireland #Protocol...
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🧐" title="Gesicht mit Monokel" aria-label="Emoji: Gesicht mit Monokel">
1/8
UK #InternalMarket Bill has arrived @UKHouseofLords.
But prob. no debate til after crunch EU Council, i.e. week after next.
But what you may not know:
It looks quite different to way it did before, inc. *big* amendments to part on N.Ireland #Protocol...
1/8
1/8" title="You may know this:UK #InternalMarket Bill has arrived @UKHouseofLords.But prob. no debate til after crunch EU Council, i.e. week after next.But what you may not know:It looks quite different to way it did before, inc. *big* amendments to part on N.Ireland #Protocol...https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🧐" title="Gesicht mit Monokel" aria-label="Emoji: Gesicht mit Monokel">1/8" class="img-responsive" style="max-width:100%;"/>
Eagle-eyed viewers among you will have spotted the first change.
The clauses have different numbershttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="#⃣" title="Tastenkappe Raute" aria-label="Emoji: Tastenkappe Raute">
Part 5 now starts with 42, not 40.
So the contentious clauses (which, "yes, do break international law") are now:
44 [export declns],
45 [state aid]
& 47 [law? schmaw!].
2/8
The clauses have different numbers
Part 5 now starts with 42, not 40.
So the contentious clauses (which, "yes, do break international law") are now:
44 [export declns],
45 [state aid]
& 47 [law? schmaw!].
2/8
The amendments made in @HouseofCommons (covered here) were proposed by the UK Govt.
Clause 42 (GB to NI) no change.
Clause 43: changes to allow new checks to occur NI to GB for certain purposes.
These amendments allow such checks for
* VAT & Excise
* GB biosecurity
3/8
Clause 42 (GB to NI) no change.
Clause 43: changes to allow new checks to occur NI to GB for certain purposes.
These amendments allow such checks for
* VAT & Excise
* GB biosecurity
3/8
On VAT & Excise, it& #39;s making sure a [new kind of] & #39;check, control or administrative process& #39; can be used for these purposes, e.g. preventing double taxation, collecting duties.
#Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRC
Anyway, moving on...
4/8
![On VAT & Excise, it& #39;s making sure a [new kind of] & #39;check, control or administrative process& #39; can be used for these purposes, e.g. preventing double taxation, collecting duties. #Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRCAnyway, moving on...4/8](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjlCygnWoAAvyze.jpg "On VAT & Excise, it& #39;s making sure a [new kind of] & #39;check, control or administrative process& #39; can be used for these purposes, e.g. preventing double taxation, collecting duties. #Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRCAnyway, moving on...4/8")
![On VAT & Excise, it& #39;s making sure a [new kind of] & #39;check, control or administrative process& #39; can be used for these purposes, e.g. preventing double taxation, collecting duties. #Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRCAnyway, moving on...4/8](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjlC2YrXYAExMML.jpg "On VAT & Excise, it& #39;s making sure a [new kind of] & #39;check, control or administrative process& #39; can be used for these purposes, e.g. preventing double taxation, collecting duties. #Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRCAnyway, moving on...4/8")
#Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRC
Anyway, moving on...
4/8
On Biosecurity:
Pests and diseases aren& #39;t great respecters of #borders, even watery and unfettered ones.
This amendment allows new checks, controls etc. on NI to GB movement of goods in order to deal with a threat to biosecurity in GB, inc (hypothetically) from NI.
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🪳" title="Cockroach" aria-label="Emoji: Cockroach">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦟" title="Mosquito" aria-label="Emoji: Mosquito">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦠" title="Microbe" aria-label="Emoji: Microbe">
5/8
Pests and diseases aren& #39;t great respecters of #borders, even watery and unfettered ones.
This amendment allows new checks, controls etc. on NI to GB movement of goods in order to deal with a threat to biosecurity in GB, inc (hypothetically) from NI.
5/8
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦟" title="Mosquito" aria-label="Emoji: Mosquito">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦠" title="Microbe" aria-label="Emoji: Microbe">5/8" title="On Biosecurity:Pests and diseases aren& #39;t great respecters of #borders, even watery and unfettered ones.This amendment allows new checks, controls etc. on NI to GB movement of goods in order to deal with a threat to biosecurity in GB, inc (hypothetically) from NI.https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🪳" title="Cockroach" aria-label="Emoji: Cockroach">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦟" title="Mosquito" aria-label="Emoji: Mosquito">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦠" title="Microbe" aria-label="Emoji: Microbe">5/8">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦟" title="Mosquito" aria-label="Emoji: Mosquito">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦠" title="Microbe" aria-label="Emoji: Microbe">5/8" title="On Biosecurity:Pests and diseases aren& #39;t great respecters of #borders, even watery and unfettered ones.This amendment allows new checks, controls etc. on NI to GB movement of goods in order to deal with a threat to biosecurity in GB, inc (hypothetically) from NI.https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🪳" title="Cockroach" aria-label="Emoji: Cockroach">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦟" title="Mosquito" aria-label="Emoji: Mosquito">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🦠" title="Microbe" aria-label="Emoji: Microbe">5/8">
But that isn& #39;t even the exciting part!
We come now to clause 47.
The
"Notwithstanding inconsistency or incompatibility with international or other domestic law"
One.
Just take a look at what& #39;s new here...
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😲" title="Erstauntes Gesicht" aria-label="Emoji: Erstauntes Gesicht">
6/8
We come now to clause 47.
The
"Notwithstanding inconsistency or incompatibility with international or other domestic law"
One.
Just take a look at what& #39;s new here...
6/8
6/8" title="But that isn& #39;t even the exciting part!We come now to clause 47.The"Notwithstanding inconsistency or incompatibility with international or other domestic law"One.Just take a look at what& #39;s new here...https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😲" title="Erstauntes Gesicht" aria-label="Emoji: Erstauntes Gesicht">6/8" class="img-responsive" style="max-width:100%;"/>
The amended clause specifies that Section 6(1)* of #HumanRights Act 1998 does not apply in relation to Cl. 44 & 45 (the ones to breach the #Protocol).
That section requires acts of public authorities to be compatible with ECHR rights.
Why explicitly disapply it here?
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">
7/8
That section requires acts of public authorities to be compatible with ECHR rights.
Why explicitly disapply it here?
7/8
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">7/8" title="The amended clause specifies that Section 6(1)* of #HumanRights Act 1998 does not apply in relation to Cl. 44 & 45 (the ones to breach the #Protocol). That section requires acts of public authorities to be compatible with ECHR rights.Why explicitly disapply it here?https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">7/8">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">7/8" title="The amended clause specifies that Section 6(1)* of #HumanRights Act 1998 does not apply in relation to Cl. 44 & 45 (the ones to breach the #Protocol). That section requires acts of public authorities to be compatible with ECHR rights.Why explicitly disapply it here?https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">7/8">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">7/8" title="The amended clause specifies that Section 6(1)* of #HumanRights Act 1998 does not apply in relation to Cl. 44 & 45 (the ones to breach the #Protocol). That section requires acts of public authorities to be compatible with ECHR rights.Why explicitly disapply it here?https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❓" title="Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol">7/8">
