I find this hit-job on @MLevitt_NP2013 unacceptable
@lpachter behaves as if he is the arbiter of truth and that he is right and Dr. Levitt is wrong
Dr. Levitt has made some wrong predictions, and he’s owned up to them - see unherd interview
1/5 https://twitter.com/lpachter/status/1307979034647822336">https://twitter.com/lpachter/...
@lpachter behaves as if he is the arbiter of truth and that he is right and Dr. Levitt is wrong
Dr. Levitt has made some wrong predictions, and he’s owned up to them - see unherd interview
1/5 https://twitter.com/lpachter/status/1307979034647822336">https://twitter.com/lpachter/...
But he ignores the correct prediction of burnout at 500-800 deaths/million which is currently being proven correct in Sweden
I take great offense to this type of hateful dehumanization of your opponents
Lior could have respectfully disagreed and made the same arguments
2/5
I take great offense to this type of hateful dehumanization of your opponents
Lior could have respectfully disagreed and made the same arguments
2/5
Instead, he transformed himself into the righteous keeper of truth and Dr. Levitt into an evil science denier
I can not imagine more egregious behavior in the scientific community
Lior, shame on you
Your career will forever be tarnished by this despicable smear
3/5
I can not imagine more egregious behavior in the scientific community
Lior, shame on you
Your career will forever be tarnished by this despicable smear
3/5
Your mistake is thinking that the woke group-think will last forever
Dr Levitt may ultimately be proven wrong, but your behavior is unacceptable
Real scientists acknowledge dissenting voice because once upon a time that was Galileo
“People will die” is not a justification
4/5
Dr Levitt may ultimately be proven wrong, but your behavior is unacceptable
Real scientists acknowledge dissenting voice because once upon a time that was Galileo
“People will die” is not a justification
4/5
I really hope that you retract this article and work towards agreeing to disagree with @MLevitt_NP2013
I am happy to debunk your entire blog, but I don’t think that’s constructive
My main critique to you is: don’t be so sure that you are right
History shows that’s wrong
5/5
I am happy to debunk your entire blog, but I don’t think that’s constructive
My main critique to you is: don’t be so sure that you are right
History shows that’s wrong
5/5
6/5 - Of course if you’d rather publicly debate this humble GummiBear, I’m game
Should be simple
But I should mention two things:
-I’ve studied way more data than you can imagine
-I’ve many scientist followers able 2 help when u try to discredit me on pedantic technicalities
Should be simple
But I should mention two things:
-I’ve studied way more data than you can imagine
-I’ve many scientist followers able 2 help when u try to discredit me on pedantic technicalities