You ever have interactions with people online and genuinely wonder if they’re selectively illiterate, or just purposely misunderstanding you?

TBC: there IS empirical evidence that circumcised men are significantly less likely to contract HIV. (See tweets belowhttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇🏼" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten (mittelheller Hautton)" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten (mittelheller Hautton)">)
My final words before muting that shit + the info & SS I shared:

Link: https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/?fbclid=IwAR28V5EBQMrHMef4QVa3XE_4JNVID5SCTPxYr7FdWYZ5HDyRhlQqUn6xNDU">https://www.who.int/hiv/topic...
I literally shared that screenshot + the link in the very next comment following my initial comment, to be clear.

I never said anything about hygiene, because “hygiene” isn’t even the reason why male circumcision helps prevent HIV/AIDS, and thus not a medical justification.
I’m still not over the fact that I got called antisemitic because I don’t generally support circumcising your son, whilst also being accused of supposedly advocating for circumcision over teaching hygiene lmao
But mostly I’m just baffled by the blatant lack of nuance & the straight up denial of actual facts in this thread.

Like, do people realize more than one thing can be true at the same time?
You can follow @EvelineJuly.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: