Really interesting (and logical) stuff from @EnergySysCat this morning on Consumer Insight in their Net Zero Webinar series (a bit of a thread):

https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👉" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts"> The term & #39;Net Zero& #39; isn& #39;t understood by everyone
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👉" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts"> People are addicted to their cars as public transport isn& #39;t good enough

https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👉" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts"> People say they want to replace heating with low carbon option but evidence/data suggests they don& #39;t - cost and convenience are the primary factors stopping them. It& #39;s very easy to replace like-for-like. Swapping a gas boiler for a low-carbon option requires a lot more legwork

& #39;We can achieve net zero by 2050, but it& #39;ll require people to take part. They have the veto& #39;. This is true - the incentives, systems and tech offered to households and consumers needs to be as good or better than they have today. If you make it hard then people just won& #39;t do it.