The 3-sphere S³ can be seen as R³ plus a point at infinity. But here London Tsai shows the "Hopf fibration": S³ as a bundle of circles over the 2-sphere. Each point in S³ lies on one circle. The set of all these circles forms a 2-sphere.
S³ is an S¹ bundle over S².
(1/n)
S³ is an S¹ bundle over S².
(1/n)
But the 3-sphere S³ is also a group! It& #39;s called SU(2): the group of 2×2 unitary matrices with determinant 1.
So we can see the group SU(2) as an S¹ bundle over S². But in fact we can build *many* groups from spheres!
(2/n) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKotMPGFJYk">https://www.youtube.com/watch...
So we can see the group SU(2) as an S¹ bundle over S². But in fact we can build *many* groups from spheres!
(2/n) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKotMPGFJYk">https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Let& #39;s try SU(3). This acts on the unit sphere in C³. C³ is 6-dimensional as a real space, so this sphere has dimension one less: it& #39;s S⁵. Take your favorite point in here; each element of SU(3) maps it to some other point. So SU(3) is a bundle over S⁵.
(3/n)
(3/n)
*Many* elements of SU(3) map your favorite point in S⁵ to the same other point. What are they like? They form a copy of SU(2), the subgroup of SU(3) that leaves some unit vector in C³ fixed.
So SU(3) is an SU(2) bundle over S⁵.
(4/n) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXDQsmL-8Us">https://www.youtube.com/watch...
So SU(3) is an SU(2) bundle over S⁵.
(4/n) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXDQsmL-8Us">https://www.youtube.com/watch...
SU(3) is an SU(2) bundle over S⁵. But SU(2) is itself a sphere, S³. So:
SU(3) is an S³ bundle over S⁵.
In other words, you can slice SU(3) into a bunch of 3-spheres, one for each point on the 5-sphere. Kinda like a higher-dimensional version of this picture.
(5/n)
SU(3) is an S³ bundle over S⁵.
In other words, you can slice SU(3) into a bunch of 3-spheres, one for each point on the 5-sphere. Kinda like a higher-dimensional version of this picture.
(5/n)
How about SU(4), the 4×4 unitary matrices with determinant 1? We can copy everything: this group acts on C⁴ so it acts on the unit sphere S⁷. The elements mapping your favorite point to some other form a copy of SU(3).
So, SU(4) is an SU(3) bundle over S⁷.
(6/n)
So, SU(4) is an SU(3) bundle over S⁷.
(6/n)
We& #39;ve seen:
SU(4) is an SU(3) bundle over S⁷.
SU(3) is an S³ bundle over S⁵.
So SU(4) is a S³ bundle over an S⁵ bundle over S⁷!
Maybe you see the pattern now. We can build SU(n) groups as "iterated sphere bundles".
(7/n)
SU(4) is an SU(3) bundle over S⁷.
SU(3) is an S³ bundle over S⁵.
So SU(4) is a S³ bundle over an S⁵ bundle over S⁷!
Maybe you see the pattern now. We can build SU(n) groups as "iterated sphere bundles".
(7/n)
For example, SU(5) is an S³ bundle over an S⁵ bundle over an S⁷ bundle over S⁹.
As a check, you can compute the dimension of SU(5) somehow and show that yes, indeed
dim(SU(5)) = 3 + 5 + 7 + 9
(8/n)
As a check, you can compute the dimension of SU(5) somehow and show that yes, indeed
dim(SU(5)) = 3 + 5 + 7 + 9
(8/n)
Even better, the group U(5) of *all* unitary 5×5 matrices is an S¹ bundle over an S³ bundle over an S⁵ bundle over an S⁷ bundle over S⁹. The S¹ here comes from the choice of determinant.
So:
dim(U(5)) = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 5²
and this pattern works in general.
(9/n)
So:
dim(U(5)) = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 5²
and this pattern works in general.
(9/n)