This is the same misrepresentation (excluding don& #39;t knows in an attempt to claim a majority or near majority that doesn& #39;t exist) that IPSO ruled against the Telegraph for last year https://twitter.com/BenRosher/status/1283319974975733766">https://twitter.com/BenRosher...

Except in this case it wasn& #39;t just excluding don& #39;t knows (there was no don& #39;t know option) - it excludes 30% who picked the neither agree/disagree mid-point in a five point scale

IPSO& #39;s ruling against the Telegraph last year is here
https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=06056-19

(I">https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-a... should point out that the National do say in the text they& #39;ve excluded don& #39;t knows. Obviously this isn& #39;t accurate, but at least there is there is recognition of what they are up to)

As @BenRosher says in his thread, it is also a leading question (and a bloody agree/disagree statement to boot https://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/10054)">https://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/arch...