Read on Twitter
Had missed this remarkably disingenuous (“needed two months to respond!” “the other since-dismissed cases are totally different!” “we shook up leadership!”) summary of the proceedings in a comically baseless SLAPP-suit filed by a self-styled, once-upon-a-time speech defender. https://twitter.com/roncoleman/status/1233417461556502531">https://twitter.com/roncolema...
Ron’s lawsuit is based on what he calls the “right not to be called a Nazi”—which is not a thing and which thinking people recognize as an effort to censor. By contrast, here’s what litigation seeking to protect the right to call someone a Nazi looks like: https://twitter.com/scot_blog/status/1240659323233148930?s=21">https://twitter.com/scot_blog... https://twitter.com/scot_blog/status/1240659323233148930">https://twitter.com/scot_blog...
In case you all didn’t believe me about Ron advancing that utterly contrived, constitutionally ignorant “right not to be called a Nazi” thing (or got blocked), @Popehat screenshotted it way back when: https://twitter.com/popehat/status/1092460651996303360?s=21">https://twitter.com/popehat/s... https://twitter.com/popehat/status/1092460651996303360">https://twitter.com/popehat/s...
Of some note: https://twitter.com/Scot_Blog/status/1264281478973853696?s=20">https://twitter.com/Scot_Blog...
Also this: https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1264282014674345985?s=20">https://twitter.com/Popehat/s...
