I said, right here, repeatedly, that of *course* Steele knew that some of his information was Russian disinformation. And that of course the FBI knew it. Because in dealing with raw material from Russia, you *always make that assumption.* But now it& #39;s "jaw-dropping." Uh, no. /1 https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1250611775369854977">https://twitter.com/RichLowry...

This is what raw intelligence looks like before it& #39;s debated and reworked into a final report by an analyst or team of analyst. Steele didn& #39;t make the claim it was all true; Trump& #39;s defenders are arguing he did, and therefore any part of it being wrong invalidates it all. /2

This, of course, is to try to make the argument that Steele was either a dupe or doctored the evidence, presented the file as 100 percent, and sent the FBI off on an anti-Trump goose chase. This, we know from Mueller, isn& #39;t how it happened, but that& #39;s the narrative. /3

Also important: Steele would, like any good spook, include the disinformation because analyzing what the Russians are trying to seed in among the stories *is itself an important intelligence matter*. Knowing what the enemy is trying to get you to believe is an important thing. /4

Anyway, the idea that "ZOMG the Feds knew there was Russian fakery in there!" is not a revelation. I mean, if you& #39;ve been following me, I said it repeatedly. /5

Like here:
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1205208307742519296
and">https://twitter.com/RadioFree... here
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1210289163934797824
and">https://twitter.com/RadioFree... here https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1120103369253818374">https://twitter.com/RadioFree...

But sure, no one thought of it before. /6x