#Reviewers

Sarah E Seaton 🏳️‍🌈

SarahESeaton

I understand that journals are desperate for reviewers right now. But since Friday I’ve had five requests & two have already chased me. Here’s a reminder of my tips to

Alexander Arguello

NeuroMinded

something i've been thinking about based on recent discussions here and having seen the scientific sausage be made from both ends. sometimes our conceptual foundations for an area of research

˗ˏˋdeeˎˊ- ❀◕‿◕❀

fringe_city

When your body of work, your achievements, your impact, your competition and your success is all measured against American standards, and you're consistently and constantly racialized within that context, then

Ebrahim Bagheri

ebrahim_bagheri

1/Last week was my first year serving on @NSERC_CRSNG Discovery Grant Evaluation Group. It was an eye-opening experience and changed my view of how successful DGs should be written. Here

Ted McCormick

mccormick_ted

When a scam artist uses fraud to attack scholarship, it is not to improve scholarship. They're signalling a political position and a worldview. It is negative, hostile, and rage-filled --

pk shellboy | tonchi oneothe

tonchioneothe

in the internet age, the point of music reviews, especially on those in the underground, shouldn't be to provide "feedback" on an artist's work anymore. that feedback is now so

Daniël Lakens

lakens

Writing this paper substantially changed my thoughts on what research we should be doing as psychologists. Check out @annemscheel’s thread, but, I like this paper so much, I wanted to

Bahar Mehmani 🌍🌳🏃🏻‍♀️🎓

mehmanib

#PeerReview A fantastic way of defining a high-quality peer review: 'In this paper we explore extracts of reviews authors have received on their submissions which they regard as particularly harsh

Chris Chambers

chrisdc77

Attention all scientists (please RT): Announcing an urgent call at Royal Society Open Science for rapidly reviewed Registered Reports in any field related to #coronavirus http://neurochambers.blogspot.com/2020/03/calling-all-scientists-rapid-evaluati

Alex Woodroe

AlexWoodroe

There's no such thing as a perfect manuscript.(sorry, long-winded editing talk that's only interesting to me, feel free to ignore me! )But really, there isn't. I see a lot of

cw of the no peak clan 🌿 READ JADE CITY

artfromafriend

There's a difference between evaluating a book for what it actually is vs. what you think it should have been.It's worthwhile to ask ourselves sometimes: am I trying to connect

Abigail Hickman

_Hikikuman_

Ok rant below:So I pre-ordered “Crooked Halluelujah” by Kelli Jo Ford (not tagging because I don’t know her) and I looked on Goodreads to see what ARC reviewers were saying

🍞maddie🍞

t3t0bean

The following very long thread is my experiences as an Asian American woman at Otis. There is anti-Asian sentiment, general racism, harassment and mention of alcohol.#FuckOtisCollege #ArtSchoolStories (1/?)FOUNDATION YEAR:My Intro

Dr. Alia

aliawhs

After ten years of being rejected for my first article by a leading Journal in my field, I was asked by them to be a reviewer. It was a bittersweet

Steve Troughton-Smith

stroughtonsmith

The internals of App Review’s testing — quite fascinating! It seems like they create a trust score of your app based on a list of binary & metadata criteria, and

Nassim Nicholas Taleb

nntaleb

BOOK PUBLISHING THREAD, 1First Wave: Fashion buyers, the class of people who systematically buy NEW "idea books". The entire book industry organized to sell to them. Books must be "in