#Justices

Mark Joseph Stern

mjs_DC

The Supreme Court turned away Kim Davis' case, but Thomas (joined by Alito) wrote a jaw-dropping rant taking direct aim at Obergefell and suggesting that SCOTUS must overturn the right

Jonatan Pallesen

jonatanpallesen

This @ezraklein podcast is so profoundly misguided, it's incredible:https://vox.com/21523051/supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-ruth-bader-ginsburg-democracy-term-limitsIn the first half he talks about how bad it is if US becomes less demo

PantsuitPolitics

PantsuitPolitic

Friends, it’s Supreme Court week on the Nightly Nuance, and I am overflowing with nerdy enthusiasm. To get you ready for our review of their recent decisions, let’s do a

Chase Strangio

chasestrangio

A thread explaining what happened at SCOTUS today with respect to LGBTQ rights, what the implications are and what comes next. Today the Court declined to hear a case involving

Mondaire Jones

MondaireJones

It’s not unprecedented for Congress to adjust the size of the Supreme Court to defeat white supremacy. We’ve done it three times before.Here are some examples from our nation’s First

Tessa Berenson

tcberenson

A little story that didn't make it into my piece (https://time.com/5899010/amy-coney-barrett-senate-confirmation-hearing/) about how Amy Coney Barrett got her first clerkship: Judge Laurence Silberman of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals

Ben Alpers 🗽

Ben_Alpers

That serious people argue against Democrats adding seats to the Supreme Court BECAUSE OF THE NORMS is extraordinary and depressing....though at some level unsurprising. 1/ I am not one of

Ilya Shapiro

ishapiro

1. My take on this morning big SCOTUS argument: It’s almost certain that Americans for Prosperity Foundation and Thomas More Law Center will win this case, but the devil will

Peel

RHPeel

So I wanted to delve into why parts of the Right are so... despondent about the Court. 1/ From my perspective, the story really starts from a 2005 speech given

Elizabeth Warren

SenWarren

The name of Trump's illegitimate Supreme Court nominee in many ways doesn’t matter. We know exactly what that person is being picked to do: complete a decades-long assault on our

Lawrence Hurley

lawrencehurley

Supreme Court on a 5-4 vote has backed Catholic and Jewish religious entities in challenge to New York's coronavirus occupancy restrictions in first consequential vote by Trump appointee Amy Coney

Peter

shadowfuzz

The entire legal profession, at every institutional level from the Supreme Court down to county traffic court, is constructed to ensure above all that those with power are immune from

Ari Berman

AriBerman

Big win for voting rights: Supreme Court says Pennsylvania ballots will count if received by Friday after Election Day. Roberts joins liberals.Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh dissented. This decision could have

Ganesh Sitaraman

GaneshSitaraman

SUPREME COURT REFORM 101: Class 3, the “balanced bench,” or the 5-5-5 plan, first outlined in @voxdotcom. You might know it because @petebuttigieg discussed it quite a bit during the

The New York Times

nytimes

Judge Amy Coney Barrett is expected to be confirmed to the Supreme Court today. Here are some answers to frequently asked questions:https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/26/us/trump-biden-election#barrett-could-be-at-work-on-the-supreme-cour

Jessie Balmert

jbalmert

.@OHSupremeCourt dismisses FirstEnergy Solutions (now Energy Harbor) argument that @OhioansStandUp couldn't put a referendum on the ballot because the subsidies were a tax."Cause dismissed for lack of a justiciable controversy"