#Scientists

Noam Blum 🦉

neontaster

I don't know who needs to hear this, but projections and predictions are not the same thing. I'm starting to think that this whole fomenting frustration about the models being

Dr. Karen James

kejames

Since I posted this, I've been getting a lot of tips, here, by DM, and elsewhere, as well as expressions of "same" from other scientists.So here is a thread to

Zoe Keller

KellerZoe

#covid-19 Scientists working at the high security laboratories at Porton Down are testing for antibodies blood samples from across Britain. They hold the key to exit from lockdown https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavi

Peel

RHPeel

I think it is plausible that public officials have not gotten the most up-to-date scientific information on the disease as quickly as some randos on Twitter like myself. 2/ This

Shehab Khan

ShehabKhan

The scientists who have been advising the government about #COVID19 have started to speak more candidly about the situation. Here's a little thread of some of the things that have

Stop the Steal - Stu Cvrk

STUinSD

Thread – STEM Education Succumbs to the Left1. I have repeatedly posted about the adverse effects of Robert Conquest’s second law of politics on American cultural and political institutions. 2.

John Finagin #FBPE

JohnFinagin

1/111 Thread: I wanted to give them a chance. Surely every government around the world is facing the toughest of challenges & we were no different, but the more I

Fabrizio Zilibotti

FabrizioZilibo1

Lot of talk about mistakes of Italian authorities in the COVID crisis. Some were important (no red zone in Bergamo, reluctance to lockdown Milano, errors in some hospitals). But Italy

Aaron Rupar

atrupar

"Numbers were minimal. Numbers were going to be 100,000 people." -- Trump dodges a question about whether he takes any responsibility for the number of US coronavirus deaths surpassing 50,000

SCAREY

SCmusic82

Thread: The “Experts” are wrong!Remember when the “Experts” said 15 days to flatten the curve?Or masks will slow the spread and save lives? Then the CDC dropped a study showing

Josh Rogin

joshrogin

This @NBCNews report on their field trip to Wuhan Institute of Virology has several errors, but the most glaring is that it misrepresents what U.S. officials wrote in diplomatic cables

Celeste Labedz

celestelabedz

Required reading for geoscientists in the U.S. (and recommended reading for anyone who loves the outdoors) relevant to recent events: "Black Faces, White Spaces" by Dr. Carolyn Finney, about the

Helen De Cruz

Helenreflects

Some thoughts on sars-cov-2/Covid-19 and how the public should understand itI'm a philosopher of science and work, among other things, on the public understanding of science, and how the public

Michael Cunningham, MD, FACC, FSCAI

OSHeartDoc

Tate, you are wrong. You assume you are finding every “case.” You aren’t... not even close. You are discounting T-cell immunity and mucosal IgA antibodies which you cannot easily test

Marc Lipsitch

mlipsitch

Two of these scientists, @SunetraGupta and @MartinKulldorff, have long been my friends. But I think they are dead wrong without a demonstrated plan for how such shielding would work. There

David Perell

david_perell

1/ @wolfejosh's first ambition was to become a scientist and find a cure for AIDS. 2/ The best entrepreneurs and scientists master the consensus knowledge base. Then, they innovate with