#SCOTUS

Nicolette Glazer

NicoletteGlazer

HUGE!!!! Supreme Court give DREAMers a major win: rescinding #DACA violates the APA must be vacated. #HomeIsHere Extremely complex decision w many many subtle layers w huge implications 4 all

John M. Reeves

reeveslawstl

1) I cannot overstate how big of a deal this is--Noel Francisco, the Solicitor General of the United States--has signed the DOJ's response in support of mandamus against Sullivan. This

Sam Levine

srl

"We are having a really hard time getting any answers from the postal service themselves," @WI_Elections admin Wolfe says of investigation into what happened with reportedly lost ballots in Wisconsin

Brian Beutler

brianbeutler

The “prioritize popular things” school doesn’t account for issues like court expansion and impeachment where public opinion follows elites. If Dems unify, it’ll become a 50-50 issue. If they let

Dave Nicponski ✍️

virus_dave

So, serious question. Let's hope Dems successfully take back both Senate and Presidency this November.Clearly, it's far too dangerous to try to "go back to 2015 normal" and hope for

Groucho's Ghost

GrouchoG

A thread on the impossibility of US citizens today being subjected to military tribunals. @travis_view @PokerPolitics @rothschildmd @dappergander Military tribunals were used (& abused) occasionally in early US history, particularly

]intheMatrixxx[

intheMatrixxx

They murder Scalia. We replace w protege. John Podesta to DC lobbyist Steve Elmendorf. Podesta writes, "Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard."Elmendrof responds, "I am

Jay Kuo

nycjayjay

I received a number of inquiries concerning whether the PA federal court case that was dismissed with prejudice yesterday can or will find its way up to SCOTUS on appeal.

Myke

Sinixstar

The scary thing about the possibility of Roe being challenged - is that even if you're against abortion - Roe isn't entirely about abortion.Roe recognized for the first time the

Fiona Scott Morton

ProfFionasm

Amazing feature of the Sabre case (shout out to @jlazarev for noticing). The court finds in para 102-4 that Farelogix *tried* to become 2-sided and was blocked (excluded) by Sabre,

John M. Reeves

reeveslawstl

THREAD1) In his brief filed today, Judge Sullivan makes the arguments I anticipated in my amicus brief (my amicus brief is linked below, along with Judge Sullivan's).https://www.scribd.com/document/463950858/05-29-2020-3-Jmr-Corrected-A

Orin Kerr

OrinKerr

Here's a thread with a few random thoughts about "court packing," that is, changing the size of the Supreme Court. Bonus: My views are somewhere in the middle and are

Todd N. Tucker

toddntucker

This from Ginsburg's dissent in RNC v. DNC is all you need to know."The Court’s suggestion that the current situation is not “substantially different” from “an ordinary election” boggles the

Dilan Esper

dilanesper

I shouldn't have to need to do this, but let me explain to you why court packing is such a bad idea. 1/ First, some observations. The most important one-

MaReQ⭐⭐⭐

Mareq16

Anon on Justice John Roberts.Comped Jack & Josie Roberts, John Roberts’ Children: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Knowhttps://heavy.com/news/2017/01/jack-josie-roberts-john-roberts-children-family-adopted-inauguration-supreme-court-chief-jus

Eric Ruiz Bybee

ericbybee

For more context on what was at stake with the recent SCOTUS ruling, please check out this 2017 article co-authored by @_Mr_Luis, José García, and me. /1https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316467270_The_Day_That_Changed_My_Life_Again