1/10 Long thread: BC CDC data is being manipulated months after first release to fit govt agenda.

For each Health Authority, Unknowns in daily data are for undetermined age. They get reallocated into specific age categories at a later date.

That's how it should work, but...
2/10 Unknown numbers for Total Tests (via daily data dump) keep growing & growing. THAT'S TROUBLESOME. Look at the red line below (accumulating total of Health Authorities) up to Oct 28. New Tests spiked to 1314 on Sep 18. Welp, maybe someone had a bad day, didn't enter age data.
3/10 By Nov 26, Total Tests for Unknowns grew to 35147. Look at the New Tests curve (purple). Compare to brown curve previous tweet. THAT SHOULDN'T CHANGE SHAPE. OK, so they backdated minus private tests. But New Tests corrected back to March, w/ few privates due to shutdown?
4/10 Dec 17: BC CDC now had plenty of time to fix/reconcile private tests. Total Tests back to 19862 compared to 35147 in prev. graph. But those darn New Tests (green) keep changing daily! Note peaks at 1236 and 692, which aren't on prev. graph.
5/10 From Dec 22 data dump (latest): Another big increase in Total Tests, now at 27992. New Tests curve (blue) has changed shape from previous. The red curve for Total Tests has changed shape from Mar to mid Aug. THIS IS HIGHLY IRREGULAR.
6/10 I'll provide more evidence on how the numbers for New Tests and Total Tests changes for many days in various HAs from roughly Mar through Dec in a later thread. Let's discuss the suspicious nature of the Unknowns.

1. Unknown numbers shouldn't grow and grow, because..(more)
7/10 ... it makes charts for all the various Health Authorities highly suspect for accuracy

2. New Tests get reallocated to various HAs, but they get moved around again, sometimes back to Unknowns (later thread). A GAME OF MUSICAL CHAIRS.

3. It's my suspicion that...
8/10 ... Unknowns are a temporary repository. Some of New Tests provided daily likely DON'T EXIST. Think about it. You can't fake infections due to traceable test records, but a few 100 bogus tests to lower positivity (% pos. is infected cases over total cases tested)?...(more)
9/10 4. At a later time, the bogus New Tests get moved into the Unknowns, where they accumulate higher and higher, and where no one will likely question them.

Meh, perhaps the Unknowns are indeed legitimate for test subjects of indeterminate age? Like these critters?... (more)
10/10 Or was it these adorable critters? Ya know, bump up the "New Tests" number, lower the positivity, and show that they don't spread the virus in their locales where they spend most of their weekdays. Quietly remove those fake numbers later. Great to support a fake narrative.
You can follow @sherwhizt.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.