Read on Twitter
How would the Ga. Secy of State's statements about Graham play in court??? Well, glad you asked.
Raffensperger would be seen as extremely credible. He's a repub, who would in no way benefit from falsely providing info that puts a powerful GOP senator in a bad light. On the 1/
Raffensperger would be seen as extremely credible. He's a repub, who would in no way benefit from falsely providing info that puts a powerful GOP senator in a bad light. On the 1/
contrary, from his career standpoint, at least, he has every reason to keep silent about it. Raffensperger is relaying statements Graham made directly to him, which under the law would be considered "verbal acts," that is, not hearsay. Graham, on the other hand, admits he 2/
contacted the Ga. Sec'y of State, even tho' he's not even a senator from that state. Why, pray tell, would he contact Raffensperger at all? The most logical explanation is entirely consistent w/Raffensperger's statements. I'd be happy to call the Ga. Sec'y of State as a witness.
The point is not so much whether Graham would or would not be prosecuted. The point is that we should not let Graham get away with the inevitable he said-he said response.
